Equally, the Axioms cannot be drawn upon to conclude that no harm will ever result if all individuals are tolerated whatever their attributes or behaviour. Only God is holy in and of Himself. Most often we weaken it Sanctity of human life essay we chafe against the implications of its universality—its vision of the weak, the enemy, the disabled, the stranger, the unborn, the sinner, the poor, the ex-friend, the racial other, or whoever else we find it difficult to include within the community of the truly human.
It follows that the Society can properly support the sanction of death for individuals or groups who cannot otherwise be prevented from presenting a real or substantial threat to our continued survival as a species, despite that action being directly contrary to its obligation to preserve and develop every such member.
There remains however, a wide field of debate about how best that may be achieved, and how that principle is to be applied in the complexities created by our growing knowledge and evolving social life.
As a slogan it then evokes equally unthinking resistance from those who react negatively to anything that reminds them of conservative Christianity.
Many apply the sanctity of life to issues like abortion and euthanasia, and, while it definitely applies to those issues, it applies to much more. However, such a life-preserving decision has Sanctity of human life essay own adverse consequences.
In the first place, as is argued in the Treatise on Justice and Tolerance, and in the Essays on Childhood, Freedom and Politics and elsewhere, an acceptance of the Axioms and choice of the Dogma establishes the rank and priority of the Conditions of the Dogma, i.
That task will be undertaken here. Take, for instance, the stance of the Society that the value of every individual is inestimable.
Only when that condition of the Dogma has been fully safeguarded or is not threatened should the Society then turn to a consideration of the need to maximise the potential of every individual member of humanity. It may then be resolved by the preservation, protection and full development of every individual no matter what their qualities or characteristics.
The only reason the sanctity of life applies to humanity is the fact that God created us in His image and set us apart from all other forms of life. It flows from the very best sources of our western cultural heritage Jewish, classical, Christian, and modern but simultaneously challenges other dimensions of these sources.
The problem for the Society is that, in the reality of human social life, those objectives are not necessarily compatible, and may be mutually exclusive on occasion.
But this hardly fits the culture wars paradigm. The outcome of the various earlier comments and arguments on this subject in the founding books of the Society of HumanKind is that, despite the powerful commitment of the Society to the preservation and development of every individual, decisions resulting in the loss or curtailment of human life may nevertheless occasionally be necessary.
If however, avoidance fails and a life-destroying decision has to be faced, then the Society should ensure that the decision is dealt with on an immediate, specific and individual basis rather than by any attempt to generate long-term or generally applicable prescriptions.
It is a notion simultaneously sturdy and fragile—sturdy because it cannot be erased entirely from human consciousness and has withstood numerous ferocious challenges, fragile because it is all too easily set aside, rationalized away, or rejected.
How the Society might reach such difficult decisions was not discussed in those earlier works. On the other hand, neither can the Society specify which characteristics or qualities of individuals must always be encouraged or preferred.
Taking the example of the questions posed earlier, the view of the Society must be that it should always seek to resolve questions of abortion by improving our knowledge of contraception and conception avoidance. If the history of human society has any recurring themes one of them must surely be that of a constant struggle to contain and suppress the tendency of some members of humanity to develop and deploy, whether consciously or not, ever more sophisticated ways of destroying their fellows, our environment or the social order on which our survival depends.
In the Treatise on the Individual an argument is set out, based on an extreme case, for the preservation of every human life.The phrase sanctity of life refers to the idea that human life is sacred, holy, and precious, argued mainly by the pro-life side in political and moral debates over such controversial issues as abortion, contraception, euthanasia, embryonic stem-cell research, and the "right to die" in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom and other English.
The sanctity of human life is a core principle for Focus on the Family. We believe that human beings are created by God in His image.
Therefore every person, from conception to natural death, possesses inherent dignity and immeasurable worth—including preborn children, elderly individuals, those with special needs and others marginalized by. The “sanctity of life” is a phrase that in recent decades became commonplace in the moral and political debates concerning a wide range of bioethical issues: abortion, embryo research, cloning, genetic engineering, euthanasia, and others.
Published: Mon, 5 Dec The Christian response to abortion in our western culture has been a matter of preserving the sanctity of life. Although it would seem to be cut and dry to a Christian that abortion violates that sanctity of life, it continues to face constitutional evolvement, differing worldviews, the scrutiny of the medical profession, and with.
Essay about The Human Being and Living the Good Life Words | 7 Pages. Final Paper The Human Being and Living The Good Life This paper contains the different definitions of what it means to be a human being and living a good life.
Sanctity of Life - Sanctity of Life This essay gives one person's opinion on several questions regarding life. Opinions to questions about which lives should be respected, and what the grounds are for determining the degree of respect will be given.Download