Digest andres quiroga vs parsons

The Supreme Court declared that the contract by and between the plaintiff and the defendant was one of purchase and sale, and that the obligations the breach of which is alleged as a cause of action are not imposed upon the defendant, either by agreement or by law. Thus, pursuant to the above rule a nd settled jurisprudence, any civil action ex delicto cannot prosper.

An Information was filed with the Regional Trial Court that the accused D ante Andres and Randyver Pacheco, conspiring, confederating, and helping one ano ther, did then and there willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously attack, assault, and maul Wilson Quinto inside a culvert where the three were fishing, causing W ilson Quinto to drown and die.

There was the obligation on the part of the plaintiff to supply the beds, and, on the part of the defendant, to pay their price.

As regards the shipment of beds without previous notice, it is insinuated in the record that these brass beds were precisely the ones so shipped, and that, for this very reason, the plaintiff agreed to their return. In the contract in question, what was essential, as constituting its cause and subject matter, is that the plaintiff was to furnish the defendant with the Digest andres quiroga vs parsons which the latter might order, at the price stipulated, and that the defendant was to pay the price in the manner stipulated.

An investigationconducted by the DBP revealed that the unit was being driven by a certain ZacariasPayba at the timeof the accident. Of said account, the defendant hadpaid a total of P In this case, he shall haveno further action against the purchaser to recover any unpaid balance of the price.

These features exclude the legal conception of an agency or order to sell whereby the mandatory or agent received the thing to sell it, and does not pay its price, but delivers to the principal the price he obtains from the sale of the thing to a third person, and if he does not succeed in selling it, he returns it.

Parsons to whose rights and obligations the present defendant later subrogated itselfas party of the second part: Quiroga shall furnish beds of his manufacture to Mr.

As may be seen, with the exception of the obligation on the part of the defendant to order the beds by the dozen and in no other manner, none of the obligations imputed to the defendant in the two causes of action are expressly set forth in the contract.

Quiroga for his approval.

Such facts were admittedby petitioner spouses. Only the acts of the contracting parties, subsequent to, and in connection with, the execution of the contract, must be considered for the purpose of interpreting the contract, when such interpretation is necessary, but not when, as in the instant case, its essential agreements are clearly set forth and plainly show that the contract belongs to a certain kind and not to another.

These features exclude the legal conception of an agency or order to sell whereby the mandatory or agent received the thing to sell it, and does not pay its price, but delivers to the principal the price he obtains from the sale of the thing to a third person, and if he does not succeed in selling it, he returns it.

But, even supposing that Ernesto Vidal has stated the truth, his statement as to what was his idea in contracting with the plaintiff is of no importance, inasmuch as the agreements contained in Exhibit A which he claims to have drafted, constitute, as we have said, a contract of purchase and sale, and not one of commercial agency.

Digest – Andres Quiroga vs Parsons Hardware Co

Quiroga assumes the obligation to offer and give the preference to Mr. Parsons binds himself not to sell any other kind except the "Quiroga" beds.The contract stipulates that Don Andres Quiroga, here in petitioner, grants exclusive rights to sell his beds in the Visayan region to J.

Parsons. The contract only stipulates that J.

quinto vs andres digest

Parsons should pay Quiroga within 6 months upon the delivery of beds. Posts about quiroga vs.

parsons hardware case digest philippine jurisprudence brief l law on sales and lease agency to buy and sell written by krizsexzy. Jan 09,  · Quiroga vs. Parsons Hardware 38 Phil August FACTS: On January 24,plaintiff Andres Quiroga and J. Parsons (to whose rights and obligations the present defendant Parsons Hardware Co.

later subrogated itself) entered into a contract, where it was stated among others that Quiroga grants in favor of Parsons the exclusive rights to sell his beds in the Visayan Islands. Philippine Jurisprudence - ANDRES QUIROGA vs.

PARSONS HARDWARE CO. MELBA QUINTO VS. DANTE ANDRES and RANDYVER PACHECO G.R. No. March 16, Facts: An Information was filed with the Regional Trial Court that the accused D ante Andres.

Digest - Andres Quiroga vs Parsons Hardware Co  WEEK 9 – Agency distinguished from Sale (Art. ) Andres Quiroga vs Parsons Hardware Co. 38 Phil. G.R. No. L Subject.

Download
Digest andres quiroga vs parsons
Rated 4/5 based on 73 review